4.7 Review

Advancements in overcoming challenges in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: An overview of advanced strategies

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117429

关键词

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Challenges; Extraction solvents; Dispersion procedures; Coalesce and collection of extraction phase; Automation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique is widely popular in analytical chemistry due to its high efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and simplicity. Recent advancements have addressed the limitations of DLLME, incorporating greener solvents, innovative dispersion strategies, and simplified procedures. These changes have made DLLME a more sustainable and efficient technique.
The dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique has gained widespread popularity in analytical chemistry due to its high extraction efficiency, minimal solvent consumption, cost-effectiveness, and simplicity. However, to align with green analytical sample preparation principles, recent breakthroughs have addressed various limitations of DLLME. These advancements include the use of greener solvents like deep eutectic solvents and ionic liquids, which enhance extraction efficiency while being environmentally friendly. Innovative dispersion strategies such as magnetic nanoparticles, vortex, and ultrasound techniques simplify DLLME procedures, reducing the need for additional solvents. Eliminating the time-consuming centrifugation step through mechanisms like salting-out phenomena and gas stream flotation streamlines the process and enables automation. Improved methods for extractant collection after phase separation have been introduced, based on solvent properties and advanced gas stream techniques. Overall, these advancements have transformed DLLME into a more sustainable and efficient technique, positioning it at the forefront of modern green analytical sample preparation methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据