3.8 Review

Polymeric, metallic and carbon membranes for hydrogen separation: A review

期刊

GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205167

关键词

Hydrogen; Membranes; Gas separation; Gas selectivity; Purification; Polymeric membranes; Metallic membranes; Carbon membranes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen serves as an efficient energy carrier with the capability to store and deliver a substantial amount of energy. Regardless of the production method, raw hydrogen needs to be separated/purified from other co-produced compounds. Membrane separation processes have gained significant attention due to their numerous advantages. This review article provides a summary of the main characteristics of three major membrane categories, namely polymeric, metallic, and carbon membranes. The strengths and limitations of each membrane material category are discussed, along with the review of selected articles and their highlighted evidence.
Hydrogen (H2) as an energy carrier can deliver or/and store a huge amount of energy. Hydrogen can be used in internal combustion engines or in fuel cells to generate electricity, with only byproducts water and heat. It is no coincidence that it has been characterized as the energy carrier of the future. Nevertheless, irrespectively of its production method, raw hydrogen must first be separated/purified from other co-produced compounds. Among other separation methods membrane separation processes present numerous advantages and for this reason membrane technology has attracted the interest of many research groups worldwide.In this review article the main characteristics of three major membrane categories, namely polymeric, metallic and carbon membranes, are summarized. For each membrane material category, both their strengths and limitations are mentioned, discussed and highlighted. In addition, selected articles, mainly those which have been published recently, are reviewed and their highlighted evidences are presented and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据