4.7 Article

A Snapshot on the Genomic Epidemiology of Turkey Reovirus Infections, Hungary

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 13, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13223504

关键词

Avian orthoreovirus; Spinareoviridae; whole-genome sequencing; phylogenetic analysis; reassortment; interspecies transmission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated and characterized turkey reoviruses from Hungary and compared them with strains from the United States. The results showed that certain genes of the virus are highly conserved, while others exhibit high genetic diversity. The study also suggested a common source of turkey reoviruses in Hungarian flocks, which is important for disease prevention.
Reovirus infections in turkeys are associated with arthritis and lameness. Viral genome sequence data are scarce, which makes an accurate description of the viral evolution and epidemiology difficult. In this study, we isolated and characterized turkey reoviruses from Hungary. The isolates were identified in 2016; these isolates were compared with earlier Hungarian turkey reovirus strains and turkey reoviruses isolated in the 2010s in the United States. Gene-wise sequence and phylogenetic analyses identified the cell-receptor binding protein and the main neutralization antigen, sigma C, to be the most conserved. The most genetically diverse gene was another surface antigen coding gene, mu B. This gene was shown to undergo frequent reassortment among chicken and turkey origin reoviruses. Additional reassortment events were found primarily within members of the homologous turkey reovirus clade. Our data showed evidence for low variability among strains isolated from independent outbreaks, a finding that suggests a common source of turkey reoviruses in Hungarian turkey flocks. Given that commercial vaccines are not available, identification of the source of these founder virus strains would permit a more efficient prevention of disease outbreaks before young birds are settled to fattening facilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据