4.0 Article

Religion and Development: Alternative Visions, Credibility, and Networks as Religious Assets for Sustainable Development?

期刊

PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/14649934231206302

关键词

Religion; AIDS; healthcare; environment; Sub-Saharan Africa; climate change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Religious organizations have become crucial actors in international development, but their impact on the ground is shaped by various dynamics. This article assesses the credibility, social networks, and alternative visions of development associated with religious organizations, and studies their impact in healthcare and environmental sustainability. The findings complicate the notion that religions have a solely positive impact on development, as internal dynamics and institutional pressures often lead to practices that go against Sustainable Development Goals. The article suggests the need for alternative frameworks to understand and analyze religious development initiatives.
Religious organizations have become crucial actors in international development. However, scholarly discussions have largely ignored the dynamics that shape their impact on the ground. This article examines these dynamics by assessing three claims about the specific developmental assets of religious organizations: (a) their credibility in the eyes of their beneficiaries; (b) their control over far-flung social networks; and (c) the idea that religious organizations pursue alternative visions of development. Drawing on existing research, we study these claims in two development sectors: healthcare and environmental sustainability. The results complicate linear narratives of the positive impact of religions on development. Dynamics internal to the religious field sometimes lead to practices that run counter to the Sustainable Development Goals, while institutional pressures in the field of international development push religious organizations to become more similar to their secular counterparts. We suggest the need for alternative frameworks that go beyond prevailing secularization and de-secularization narratives to pay attention to the institutional field dynamics that shape religious development initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据