4.2 Article

Reviving the Lost Spaces: Rewilding the Walled City of Nicosia Buffer Zone

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00219096231215703

关键词

Abandoned cities; Nicosia Buffer Zone; rewilding; cultural heritage; biodiversity; sustainable development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a study analyzing abandoned cities and exploring rewilding efforts in the Nicosia Buffer Zone. The research investigates the causes of abandonment, the potential benefits of reorienting the Buffer Zone through rewilding, and the importance of community involvement. By transforming the abandoned space into a green corridor, the study aims to promote peace, reconciliation, and sustainable development. The findings emphasize the significance of preserving cultural heritage, promoting biodiversity, and improving the quality of life in surrounding areas. The research contributes to urban design by examining the revival of lost spaces through rewilding and provides insights for future studies on abandoned places and urban development.
This article presents a study that aims to analyze abandoned cities and explore the rewilding efforts in the Nicosia Buffer Zone. The research methodology involves examining the causes of abandonment, the potential benefits of reorienting the Buffer Zone through rewilding, and the importance of community involvement in the process. By transforming the abandoned space into a green corridor, the study seeks to promote peace, reconciliation, and sustainable development. The analysis draws attention to the significance of preserving cultural heritage, promoting biodiversity, and improving the quality of life in surrounding areas. The findings highlight the need for comprehensive planning and implementation, considering both ecological and social factors. This research contributes to the field of urban design by examining the reviving of lost spaces through rewilding and providing insights for future research in the area of abandoned places and urban development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据