相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Robert M. Kwee et al.
Summary: This study analyzed retracted medical imaging publications using the Retraction Watch Database and found an increasing number of retractions over time. The main cause for retraction was scientific misconduct.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
(2023)
Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Thomas C. Kwee et al.
Summary: Our study aimed to investigate scientific fraud, publication bias, and honorary authorship in the field of nuclear medicine. The results showed that a small percentage of corresponding authors admitted to committing scientific fraud and a significant number reported witnessing or suspecting scientific fraud in their department. Publication bias and honorary authorship were also prevalent. Researchers in Asia displayed higher confidence in the integrity of published work compared to researchers in other regions.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
(2023)
Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Robert M. Kwee et al.
Summary: The study found that radiologists generally pay attention to scientific integrity, with some admitting to scientific fraud, publication bias, and honorary authorship. While their confidence in the integrity of published work was relatively high, there is still room for improvement. It is recommended to initiate cultural and policy reforms to address these issues.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
(2022)
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Lucy Lu et al.
Summary: This meta-analysis found evidence of widespread prevalence of small study effects in the diagnostic imaging accuracy literature. One likely contributor to the observed effects is publication bias, which can undermine the results of many meta-analyses. Conventional methods for detecting funnel plot asymmetry conducted by included studies appeared to underestimate the presence of small study effects. Further studies are required to elucidate the various factors that contribute to small study effects.
Review
Ethics
Yu Xie et al.
Summary: This meta-analysis provides updated estimates of the prevalence of research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRPs), highlighting factors that influence the prevalence of these issues. Results show that researchers often witness others committing RM and using QRPs, with response proportion, limited recall period, career level, disciplinary background, and locations significantly affecting the prevalence of irresponsible research behaviors.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
(2021)
Editorial Material
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Herbert Y. Kressel et al.
