Comparing linear damage hypothesis to linear elastic fracture mechanics in the estimation of fatigue life in a high speed light craft

Linear elastic fracture mechanics methods provide a more comprehensive representation of crack propagation compared to traditional methods such as the linear damage hypothesis (or SN curve approach). These techniques have been widely adopted in the aerospace industry, however, their usage in the design of marine structures remains limited. The presented research uses full-scale trial data measured onboard a 111 m wave piercing catamaran to compare the results obtained from linear elastic fracture mechanics and SN curve-based methods. The results reveal significant differences in estimated fatigue life between SN curve-based methods and fracture mechanics methods. These differences are likely due to limitations in the fracture mechanics model during the crack initiation phase. Changes in fracture mechanics parameters also had a significant effect on fatigue life, suggesting that if accuracy is important then material specific parameters are required. Despite the limitations shown, linear elastic fracture mechanics methods have a higher level of tailor-ability when compared to SN curve based methods and could offer benefits in situations such as the tracking of known flaws or in the assessment of changes to vessel configuration, or usage profiles.

Automated summary

Linear elastic fracture mechanics methods provide a comprehensive representation of crack propagation, but their usage in the design of marine structures is limited. The research reveals significant differences in estimated fatigue life between fracture mechanics methods and SN curve-based methods, and changes in fracture mechanics parameters also have a significant effect on fatigue life.