3.8 Article

The new dynamics of Japan's Official Development Assistance in an era of great power competition

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24761028.2023.2292438

关键词

Official Development Assistance; development cooperation; Japan; securitization of aid; universal values

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The escalation of great power rivalry due to China's rise and Russia's invasion of Ukraine has led Japan to align its foreign and security policies more closely. This paper examines how Japan has adjusted its Official Development Assistance (ODA) policy, considering it as a crucial diplomatic tool, in response to these changes. The most significant transformation is the securitization of ODA, involving the deployment of ODA to advance Japan's national security interests.
Escalation of great power rivalry resulting from China's rise and Russia's invasion of Ukraine has prompted Japan to align its foreign and security policies more closely. This paper analyzes how ODA policy, which the Japanese government regards as a crucial diplomatic instrument, has been modified in the face of these changes. The most significant transformation is the securitization of ODA, or the deployment of ODA to advance Japan's national security interests. This trend is evident in the emergence of a new type of ODA that aims to contribute to Japan's security interests by strengthening the deterrence capabilities of developing countries involved in territorial disputes with China. Notably, Japan is justifying this new ODA trend in the name of upholding the universal value of the international rule of law. In other words, Japan is shifting the focus of assistance away from domestic issues of democracy and human rights in each recipient country toward the rule of law in international relations. This is a manifestation of Japan's effort to strike a careful balance between upholding universal values and avoiding the risk of offending incumbent governments in recipient countries with questionable domestic governance records.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据