4.7 Article

Cure kinetics and thermal degradation characteristics of epoxy/polyetheramine systems

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-023-12737-6

关键词

Curing kinetics; Jeffamine; Flexible epoxy; Decomposition; Thermal stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a detailed study on the cure kinetics of epoxy and polyetheramine systems. The effect of epoxy to polyetheramine ratios and molecular masses on the curing behavior, mechanical properties, and thermal behavior of the cured networks were investigated. The results were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, temperature-modulated differential scanning colorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis. The study found that the optimized epoxy/amine ratio resulted in improved cure behavior and thermal stability of the epoxy networks.
In this paper, we report detailed cure kinetics of epoxy and polyetheramine (Jeffamine) systems. Three cured epoxy networks were prepared by using three types of Jeffamines having different molecular masses and polyether segment in the chain. The effect of epoxy to Jeffamine stoichiometric and sub-stoichiometric ratios and molecular mass of Jeffamines on curing behaviour, mechanical properties and thermal behaviour of the resulting networks were investigated. The results were explained using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis. The epoxy systems with optimised epoxy/amine ratios were studied for their cure behaviour using temperature modulated differential scanning colorimetric (MDSC) analysis. Isoconversion kinetics was studied to find out activation energy, pre-exponential factor. The conversion function, f(a) was found to be fitting as Sestak-Berggren model. Thermal behaviour of the epoxy networks was determined by a non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) both in nitrogen and air envelop. The thermal stability of the rubbery epoxy systems is observed to be much better than the conventional rubbers having unsaturation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据