4.1 Article

Small Area with Multiply Imputed Survey Data

期刊

JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 507-533

出版社

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/jos-2023-0024

关键词

Fay-Herriot model; mean squared error; multiple imputation; nonresponse; survey statistics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a framework for small area estimation with multiply imputed survey data is proposed. The framework extends the transformed Fay-Herriot model to account for the additional uncertainty from multiple imputation and provides point and mean squared error estimators. Comprehensive simulations demonstrate the reliability and precision of the proposed methodology.
In this article, we propose a framework for small area estimation with multiply imputed survey data. Many statistical surveys suffer from (a) high nonresponse rates due to sensitive questions and response burden and (b) too small sample sizes to allow for reliable estimates on (unplanned) disaggregated levels due to budget constraints. One way to deal with missing values is to replace them by several plausible/imputed values based on a model. Small area estimation, such as the model by Fay and Herriot, is applied to estimate regionally disaggregated indicators when direct estimates are imprecise. The framework presented tackles simultaneously multiply imputed values and imprecise direct estimates. In particular, we extend the general class of transformed Fay-Herriot models to account for the additional uncertainty from multiple imputation. We derive three special cases of the Fay-Herriot model with particular transformations and provide point and mean squared error estimators. Depending on the case, the mean squared error is estimated by analytic solutions or resampling methods. Comprehensive simulations in a controlled environment show that the proposed methodology leads to reliable and precise results in terms of bias and mean squared error. The methodology is illustrated by a real data example using European wealth data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据