Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus

This study presents and explains the phenomenon of indexjacking, which involves the systematic infiltration of hijacked journals into international indexing databases, with Scopus being one of the most infiltrated among these databases. Through an analysis of known lists of hijacked journals, the study identified at least 67 hijacked journals that have penetrated Scopus since 2013. Of these, 33 journals indexed unauthorized content in Scopus and 23 compromised the homepage link in the journal's profile, while 11 did both. As of September 2023, 41 hijacked journals are still compromising the data of legitimate journals in Scopus. The presence of hijacked journals in Scopus is a challenge for scientific integrity due to the legitimization of unreliable papers that have not undergone peer review and compromises the quality of the Scopus database. The presence of hijacked journals in Scopus has far-reaching effects. Papers published in these journals may be cited, and unauthorized content from these journals in Scopus is thus imported into other databases, including ORCID and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database. This poses a particular challenge for research evaluation in those countries, where cloned versions of approved journals may be used to acquire publications and verifying their authenticity can be difficult.

Automated summary

This study investigates the occurrence of indexjacking, a phenomenon where hijacked journals infiltrate international indexing databases, with Scopus being one of the most targeted databases. By analyzing known lists of hijacked journals, the study identifies at least 67 hijacked journals that have entered Scopus since 2013. These journals indexed unauthorized content and compromised journal profiles by tampering with the homepage link. The presence of hijacked journals in Scopus raises concerns about scientific integrity and compromises the quality of the database.