4.7 Article

Identification, Characterization, and Receptor Binding Mechanism of New Umami Peptides from Traditional Fermented Soybean Paste (Dajiang)

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 48, 页码 18953-18962

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04943

关键词

Dajiang; umami peptides; taste characteristics; molecular docking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that the umami taste in Dajiang, a traditional Chinese condiment, originates from umami peptides. Three novel bean umami peptides were screened and characterized. Molecular docking analysis identified important amino acid residues for binding of these peptides to taste receptors. This research uncovers the mechanism of umami-peptide-driven flavor in fermented soybean products.
Dajiang, a traditional Chinese condiment, is made from fermented soybeans. It is highly popular among consumers as a result of its delicious umami flavor, which mainly originates from umami peptides. To examine the mechanism of umami taste in Dajiang, we selected Dajiang samples with strong umami taste and subjected them to purification and identification analysis using ethanol precipitation, gel chromatography, reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Subsequently, on the basis of toxicity and umami prediction analysis, we screened, synthesized, and characterized three novel bean umami peptides in Dajiang: TLGGPTTL, 758.4174 Da; GALEQILQ, 870.4811 Da; and HSISDLQ, 911.4713 Da. Their sensory threshold values were 0.25, 0.40, and 0.17 mmol/L, respectively. Furthermore, molecular docking results showed that hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are important interaction forces in the binding of umami peptide to taste receptors. Ser147 and Glu148 of the T1R3 taste receptor are important amino acid residues for binding of the three umami peptides. This study uncovers the mechanism of umami-peptide-driven flavor in fermented soybean products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据