4.6 Review

Defining oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and critical synthesis of consensus

期刊

ESMO OPEN
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102067

关键词

pancreatic cancer; oligometastasis; oligometastatic disease; consensus definition; local consolidative treatment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to explore the definition of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the use of local consolidative treatment (LCT). The findings reveal a lack of consensus on the definition of OMD in PDAC, with significant variation between studies and methodological issues. This highlights the need for a consensus definition of OMD.
Background: Small retrospective series suggest that local consolidative treatment (LCT) may improve survival in oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, no uniform definition of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in PDAC exists; this impedes meaningful conclusions.Patients and methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL registries for studies and protocols reporting on definitions and/or LCT of OMD in PDAC was performed. The primary endpoint was the definition of OMD. Levels of agreement were categorized as consensus (>= 75% agreement between studies), fair agreement (50%-74%), and absent/poor agreement (<50%).Results: After screening of 5374 abstracts, the full text of 218 studies was assessed, of which 76 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The majority of studies were retrospective (n = 66, 87%), two were prospective studies and eight were study protocols. Studies investigated mostly liver (n = 38, 51%) and lung metastases (n = 15, 20%). Across studies, less than one-half (n = 32, 42%) reported a definition of OMD, while 44 (58%) did not. Involvement was limited to a single organ (consensus). Additional criteria for defining OMD were the number of lesions (consensus), metastatic site (poor agreement), metastatic size (poor agreement), treatment possibilities (poor agreement), and biomarker response (poor agreement). Liver OMD could involve three or fewer lesions (consensus) and synchronous disease (fair agreement), while lung metastases could involve two or fewer lesions and metachronous disease (consensus). The large majority of studies were at a high risk of bias or did not include any control groups.Conclusion: Definitions of OMD were not used or varied widely between studies hampering across-study comparability and highlighting an unmet need for a consensus. The present study is part of a multistep process that aims to develop an interdisciplinary consensus on OMD in pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据