4.5 Article

Investigation of reactivity control strategies for a micro-transportable gas-cooled thermal reactor

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112758

关键词

micro-reactor; He-Xe mixture; burnable poison; sliding reflector

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micro nuclear reactors have gained attention for their high efficiency and long lifetime, making them suitable for remote and off-grid locations. This study examines the effects of burnable poisons on the performance of a micro nuclear reactor and improves the design for reactivity control. The computational results show that burnable poisons reduce excess reactivity and power peaking factor without significant impact on core lifetime.
Micro nuclear reactors have gained increasing attention in recent years due to their high efficiency and long lifetime, making them an attractive solution for meeting the energy needs of remote and off-grid locations. Previous work has proposed a conceptual design for a micro solid nuclear reactor cooled by a helium-xenon mixture. The main aim of this study is to examine the effects of introducing burnable poisons on the neutronic performance of the designed micro nuclear reactor and to improve the design of the sliding reflector segment for reactivity control. The computational results indicate that the inclusion of burnable poisons can decrease the initial excess reactivity and radial power peaking factor, while not having a significant impact on the lifetime of the core. The use of 0.4%wt Gd2O3 and 0.75%wt ZrB2 as burnable poisons results in a reduction of 6.0 $ and 7.4 $ in the maximum reactivity of the core, respectively, while the core lifetime is reduced by 169 EFPD and 545 EFPD, respectively. By partitioning the sliding reflector, a linear introduction of reactivity can be achieved, and the influence of introducing burnable poisons on the reactivity control ability of the sliding reflector is relatively small.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据