4.7 Article

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Identified in a Zoo-Housed Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis): An Anatomopathological and Metagenomic Study

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 13, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13223469

关键词

intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; sandhill crane; birds; neoplasm; metagenomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumors in birds can be caused by various factors and are a major cause of death in long-lived birds. A male sandhill crane bred in a zoo for 8 years was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), characterized by multinodular mass, severe cirrhosis, and hemorrhages. Histological examination revealed the presence of both small-duct type and large-duct type ICC.
Tumors in birds can be caused by a variety of factors such as species, age, sex, virus, chemicals, and environment. In particular, tumors are a major cause of death in long-lived birds such as parrots and zoo birds. A male sandhill crane that was bred for 8 years in a zoo was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). At necropsy, the liver revealed a multinodular mass of variable colors, and severe cirrhosis and hemorrhages were present. Histologically, ICC was characterized by the presence of both types of ICC: small-duct type and large-duct type. Large-duct-type ICC was distinguished by the presence of multifocal biliary neoplasia, characterized by the diffuse papillary proliferation of columnar cells resembling large cholangiocytes. Small-duct-type ICC was characterized by the presence of non-mucin-producing cuboidal cells such as bile duct cells. In this case, no viral cause was identified from the metagenomic analysis and PCR of ICC; however, a contributing role of Cutibacterium sp. and E. coli identified from the metagenomics could not be excluded. This study is the first to describe the anatomopathological characteristics of ICC in the studied sandhill crane and attempts to determine its potential infectious etiology using metagenomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据