4.7 Article

Detecting desertification in the ancient oases of southern Morocco

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46319-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the causes of long-term desertification is crucial for adapting to climate change and resource pressures. Existing maps do not accurately depict the extent of degraded land or traditional water systems. This study presents a new machine-learning workflow using satellite data to detect desertification. The approach was tested with a case study in southern Morocco and achieved an accuracy of 74-76% for classifying desertified fields. Traditional irrigation systems supplying the oasis were mapped using image interpretation and archaeological survey.
Understanding what led to desertification in the long-term is crucial for adaptation to climate change and pressures on resources in North Africa, but existing maps do not accurately show the extent of degraded land or the traditional water systems which underpinned cultivation. These products rely on recent vegetation trends and hindcasted statistical data. Desertification which occurred prior to the later twentieth century is poorly represented, if at all. However, large areas of abandoned fields are distinctive in satellite imagery as brightly reflectant and smooth surfaces. We present a new and open-source machine-learning workflow for detecting desertification using satellite data. We used Google Earth Engine and the random forest algorithm to classify five landcover categories including a class representing desertified fields. The input datasets comprised training polygons, a 12-band Sentinel-2 composite and derived tasselled cap components, and a Sentinel-1 VV-polarisation composite. We test our approach for a case study of Skoura oasis in southern Morocco with a resulting accuracy of 74-76% for the desertification class. We used image interpretation and archaeological survey to map the traditional irrigation systems which supply the oasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据