3.8 Article

How Economic Growth Contributes to CO2 Emissions in the Presence of Globalization and Eco-Innovations in South Asian Countries?

期刊

WORLD
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 202-213

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/world4010014

关键词

eco-innovations; CO2; globalization; South Asian countries; QARDL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the impact of eco-innovations, globalization, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in a panel of South Asian countries. The results indicate that environmental quality is being harmed by globalization and economic growth, while eco-innovations contribute to a decrease in climate-change-causing CO2 emissions. The study also confirms the Environmental Kuznets Curve theory in developing nations. These findings imply the need for South Asian countries to transition to renewable energy sources for improved environmental quality.
Many nations made pledges at the Paris climate conference to eventually become carbon neutral. As a result, the effects of eco-innovations (ECO), globalization (GLO), and economic growth (GDP) on CO2 emissions in a panel comprising India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan are assessed in this work. This study employs a unique panel (QARDL) methodology to data from 1980Q1 to 2018Q4 for analysis. The purpose of this study is to find the relation between GDP, GLO, ECO and CO2. The results show that environmental quality is being harmed because of GLO and GDP. Climate-change-causing CO2 emissions are decreasing globally thanks to ECO. Furthermore, the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory in developing nations has been confirmed by this work. This study implies that the selected South Asian countries should switch to renewable energy sources to improve environmental quality. In addition, governments will need to rethink their approach to global trade. Importing effective technologies for producing renewable energy should be a priority. The future looks bright for these nations, as rising environmental consciousness will likely lead to the adoption of stringent environmental rules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据