4.6 Article

Enhancing Facial Reconstruction Using Graph Attention Networks

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 136680-136691

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3338725

关键词

Graph convolution network; graph attention network; convolution neural network; variational autoencoder; facial reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional 3D facial reconstruction methods use PCA-based 3DMMs, while restoration methods based on GCN have advantages in directly regressing vertex coordinates and colors. This study presents a face restoration approach that improves stability and accuracy by directly regressing vertex coordinates and colors from 2D facial images.
Traditionally, research on three-dimensional (3D) facial reconstruction has focused heavily on methods that use 3D Morphable Models (3DMMs) based on principal component analysis (PCA). Because such methods are linear, they are robust to external noise. The PCA method has limitations when restoring faces that deviate from the training data distribution, particularly when recovering fine details. By contrast, restoration methods utilizing Graph Convolution Networks (GCN) offer the advantages of non-linearity and direct regression of vertex coordinates and colors. However, GCN-based approaches can be prone to overfitting, making them less stable. This study presents a face restoration approach that aims to regress the vertex coordinates and colors of a 3D face model directly from a single wilds 2D facial image. This method demonstrates greater stability and higher accuracy compared to conventional techniques. In addition, Graph Attention Networks (GAT) enhance the restoration performance while separating the networks responsible for facial shape and color, reducing noise caused by interference between different data attributes. Through experiments, we demonstrate the most optimized network structures and training methods and demonstrate improved performance compared to existing approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据