4.6 Article

Recent events of land subsidence in Alaknanda valley: a case study of sinking holy town Joshimath, Uttarakhand, India

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04263-0

关键词

Land subsidence; Joshimath; Hit zone; Geological discontinuities; Sinking; Remedial measures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviews the current status and causes of land subsidence in Joshimath town, Uttarakhand, India. The town is located in a geologically unstable area, close to major fault lines, and has experienced population growth, leading to ongoing slope instability and land subsidence. The results of this study are important for scientific monitoring and mitigation of land subsidence.
Recent events of land subsidence in culturally and tourism-centric Joshimath town in the Chamoli district of Uttarakhand culminate in declaring the town as a landslide/subsidence 'hit zone' area. The area is highly vulnerable to various geological and hydrological disasters stemming from its rugged terrain and geological instability. The recent tragic occurrence of land subsidence caused adverse implications on the infrastructure and local population's sustenance inducing disturbances in environmental, and social facets. This study incorporates a brief review of the current status and plausible causes of land subsidence in Joshimath town. The establishment of the town on the 'debris of ancient landslide,' proximity to major geological discontinuities, tectonically fragile area, and population upsurge are key drivers that appear to have exacerbated the ongoing slope instability and land subsidence. Thus, the present review will aid to encompass further scientific studies to monitor the sinking of ground in such mountainous regions for mitigating land subsidence. Furthermore, it also discusses the consequences of land subsidence and remedial measures, thereby aiding policymakers and concerned authorities to develop risk management plans and therefore enhancing the region's overall resilience to such disasters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据