4.1 Article

Analyzing entheseal changes in commingled human remains from Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in Portugal

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oa.3273

关键词

agriculturalists; Coimbra method; commingled human remains; entheseal changes; hunter-gatherers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of entheseal changes requires knowledge of the biological profile of the sample. This study analyzed bone elements from Late Mesolithic and Late Neolithic/Chalcolithic archaeological sites in Portugal. The results showed higher entheseal changes in individuals older than 40, with little effect from body size. Biomechanical properties of the bones were positively correlated with some entheseal features, and there was an increase in entheseal changes during the Neolithic.
The analysis of entheseal changes requires knowing the biological profile of the sample analyzed, given that, mainly, the sex and age of the individuals influence the prevalence and degrees of the entheseal features. However, the bioarcheological record of several past populations presents isolated and commingled human bone remains, which constrains the estimation of such data. In this work, we propose to analyze the entheseal changes with the Coimbra method in a sample composed mainly of commingled human bone remains and, to a lesser extent, of semi-complete individuals. For this purpose, we analyzed 312 bone elements from the upper and lower limbs of Late Mesolithic (Muge complex) and Late Neolithic/Chalcolithic archeological sites from Portugal. The results support previous information that individuals older than 40 present higher entheseal changes. In addition, body size has a low effect on entheseal changes and bone's biomechanical properties are positively correlated with some entheseal features. Some entheseal traits show higher prevalence during the Mesolithic, but there is mainly an increase in entheseal changes during the Neolithic. Although these differences could be due to different biological profiles between both samples, differences in lifestyle may also have contributed to the results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据