3.8 Article

Should I Accept or Refute? Understanding the Socio-Organizational Factors Influencing Corruption in Ghana's Public Service

期刊

PUBLIC INTEGRITY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10999922.2023.2290749

关键词

Corruption; social-cultural factors; organizational factors; unethical behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite intensified global anti-corruption efforts, corruption remains common in Ghana's public service. This study focuses on how context-specific socio-organizational factors influence employees' engagement in corrupt activities. Key factors such as opportunistic staffing, reciprocal appreciation, praise singing, and orders from above were identified. Formal rules and sanctions alone are inadequate in addressing corruption due to the complex contextual nature of the socio-organizational factors.
Corruption remains endemic despite intensified global anti-corruption efforts, indicating a need to reassess current strategies. This study focused on how context-specific socio-organizational factors influence employees' engagement in corrupt activities in Ghana's public service. The sample for the study consists of 48 public service workers. This includes 26 middle-level management staff who participated in the focus group discussions and 22 directors who were interviewed individually. Additionally, 8 expert interviews were conducted to enhance comprehension and discussion of the findings. Key socio-organizational factors, including opportunistic staffing, reciprocal appreciation, praise singing, and order from above were identified. Formal rules and sanctions alone were found to be inadequate in addressing corruption due to the complex contextual nature of the socio-organizational factors. These factors could serve as a foundation for designing training programs and nudges that promote ethical behavior. Moreover, they offer valuable insights for developing anti-corruption interventions that align with the practical realities of ethical decision-making in Ghana's public service.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据