3.8 Article

The Huangshan Neolithic site in Nanyang, Henan : Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology; Nanyang Municipal Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology

期刊

CHINESE ARCHAEOLOGY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 14-33

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/char-2023-0002

关键词

Nanyang City, Henan Province; Huangshan site; core settlement; stone/jade artifacts; Neolithic Age

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, in collaboration with the Nanyang Municipal Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, conducted excavations at the Huangshan site in Nanyang City from May 2018 to January 2022. The excavation uncovered various structures and artifacts from different cultural periods, including a dock, a canal, houses, tombs, and stone/jade workshops. This significant discovery sheds light on Neolithic jade production sites in the Central Plains and middle Yangtze River region.
The Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, in conjunction with the Nanyang Municipal Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, carried out excavations across an area of 2400m2 at the Huangshan site in Nanyang City from May 2018 to January 2022. The site spans various cultural periods, ranging from the Yangshao and Qujialing to Shijiahe cultures. The excavation uncovered a wide variety of structures and artifacts, including one dock, one section of a canal, 48 houses and stone/jade workshops, 157 tombs, eight sacrificial pits, and more than 140 urn burials. As many as 45,000 jade/stone artifacts was also unearthed. These findings confirm that Huangshan was a core settlement bounded by waterways and specialized in large-scale production of stone/jade objects. The excavation also revealed natural transportation waterways connecting the site to the well-known jade quarry of Dushan Mountain. This significant discovery fills a gap in current understandings of Neolithic jade production sites in the Central Plains and middle Yangtze River region.

作者

匿名

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据