4.5 Article

Environmental and ontogeny effects in wood fiber properties of Pterocarpus ericaneus (Poir.)

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2023.2286447

关键词

Cambial age; climatic zones; juvenile and adult wood; Pterocarpus erinaceus; wood fiber

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the wood properties of Pterocarpus erinaceus in West Africa, focusing on wood fiber properties and their influence on density and dimensional characteristics. The results showed significant variations in fiber parameters among different climatic zones, but no significant correlation between cambial age and fiber properties was found.
The present study examined the wood properties of Pterocarpus erinaceus, a species found in West Africa's Guineo-Sudanian and Sudano-Sahelian zones. The primarily focus was on wood fiber properties, which serve as indicators of cambial growth and the transition between juvenile and mature wood. The aim was to analyze the factors contributing to the variability of the wood fiber properties. Specifically, it examined the effect of cambial age and ecological factors on fiber properties and analyzed how the fiber properties influence density and dimensional characteristics of the wood. Measurements of fiber properties were obtained from 451 specimens collected in the Guinean, Sudanian, and Sahelian zones in Burkina Faso, Niger, and Togo. The results indicate significant variations in average fiber parameters among the three climatic zones. This variability leads to an increase in the length, width, and thickness of the fibers along the north-south decreasing rainfall gradient. However, no noteworthy correlations were observed between cambial age and fiber properties, posing challenges in distinguishing between juvenile and adult wood. In terms of correlation, the analysis shows that fiber length has no effect on physical properties, but fiber width significantly influences basic density, wood shrinkage, and the fiber saturation point (FSP).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据