4.0 Review

Resistance of Candida albicans Biofilms to Drugs and the Host Immune System

期刊

出版社

AHVAZ JUNDISHAPUR UNIV MED SCI
DOI: 10.5812/jjm.37385

关键词

Biofilms; Glucans; Fungal Drug Resistance; Arsenite Transporting ATPases; Candida albicans

资金

  1. ministry of higher education of Malaysia under the fundamental research grant scheme (FRGS) [203/CIPPT/11242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Candida albicans is a commensal fungus that resides on mucosal surfaces and in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts in humans. However, it can cause an infection when the immune system of the host is impaired or if a niche becomes available. Many C. albicans infections are due to the organism's ability to form a biofilm on implanted medical devices. A biofilm represents an optimal medium for the growth of C. albicans as it allows cells to be enclosed by a self-produced extracellular matrix (ECM). Objectives: The present work investigated certain aspects of the resistance of C. albicans biofilms to drugs and the host immune system. Results: An ECM was found to provide the infrastructure for biofilm formation, prevent disaggregation, and shield encapsulated C. albicans cells from antifungal drugs and the host's immune system. By influencing FKS1 and upregulating multiple glucan modification genes, beta-1, 3-glucan, an important component of ECM, was shown to be responsible for many of the biofilm's drug-resistant properties. On being engulfed by ECM, the fungal cell was found to switch from glycolysis to gluconeogenesis. Resembling the cellular response to starvation, this was followed by the activation of the glyoxylate cycle that allowed the use of simple molecules as energy sources. Conclusion: Mature biofilms were found to be much more resistant to antifungal agents and the host immune system than free cells. The factors responsible for high resistance included the complex architecture of biofilms, ECM, increased expression of drug efflux pumps, and metabolic plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据