4.6 Article

Photoluminescence and structural phase transition relationship in Er-doped BaTiO3 model ferroelectric system

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 600-606

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3tc02991c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When rare-earth ions are embedded in a ferroelectric material, their photoluminescence can serve as an all-optical probe for temperature, electric field, and mechanical stimulus. However, the impact of ferroelectric phase transitions on photoluminescence is not well understood. In this study, we demonstrate changes in the photoluminescence of green emission bands during critical ferroelectric transitions in an Er-doped BaTiO3 material. We also find that the intensity ratio and wavelength position difference of sub-peaks provide information on the phase transitions.
When embedded within a ferroelectric host matrix, rare-earth ions and their photoluminescence (PL) provide an original all-optical light probe for temperature, electric field and mechanical stimulus. However, a clear and global view of how PL is affected by the phase transitions that are inherent to ferroelectric materials is still lacking. Here, using an Er-doped BaTiO3 model ferroelectric material, we demonstrate that the PL of the green emission bands resulting from a 488 nm light excitation exhibit changes at the critical ferroelectric transitions. The transition temperatures also have a signature on the absolute temperature sensitivity we extracted from the ratio of the two main green emission bands. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the sub-peaks related to the lifting of degeneracy by the crystal field also contain information on the phase transitions. We propose that the intensity ratio and the wavelength position difference of some of these sub-peaks can be used as order parameters to describe the phase transitions. We hope our results will help better understand the link between light emission features and local polar and macroscopic structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据