4.2 Article

Religiously Unaffiliated Youth in Europe: Shifting Remnants of Belief and Practice in Contexts of Diffused Religion and Cohort Decline

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12901

关键词

unaffiliated; youth; Europe; affiliated; age groups; diffused religion; cohort replacement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the remnants and dynamics of religious beliefs and practices among religiously unaffiliated young people in Europe, comparing them with older unaffiliated individuals and religiously affiliated individuals. The study finds that, on average, young people have stronger eschatological beliefs compared to older age groups, regardless of religious affiliation. Additionally, young people engage in religious practices less frequently than older age groups, regardless of religious affiliation. The study also reveals that there are still gaps in levels of religious beliefs and practices between the religiously unaffiliated and the religiously affiliated among younger populations, but this gap has become narrower in terms of religious practices.
This study investigates the remnants and dynamics of religious beliefs and practices among religiously unaffiliated youth in Europe, comparing them with the older unaffiliated as well as with the religiously affiliated. Using EVS 2017-2021 data to test contrasting hypotheses of diffused religion and cohort replacement, the study draws three main conclusions. First, youth believe more on average and older age groups believe less when it comes to eschatological beliefs among both the unaffiliated and the affiliated. Second, youth practice less and older age groups practice more on average among both the unaffiliated and the affiliated. Third, the gaps in levels of religious beliefs and practices remain between the religiously unaffiliated and the religiously affiliated among younger populations, but this gap is now narrower for religious practices. Results confirm both hypotheses (diffused religion and cohort replacement) depending on the dimensions of religiosity at study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据