4.6 Review

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer during pregnancy: A comprehensive update

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.14134

关键词

breast cancer; pregnancy; safety; sentinel lymph node biopsy; survival outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) appears to be a safe and effective technique for breast cancer during pregnancy, according to this systematic review. A total of 63 articles were included, with 47 strongly in favor of SLNB in pregnancy-related breast cancer (PABC), 4 partially in favor, 10 strongly against, and 2 partially against. Sub-categorization based on study type showed that the majority of studies in favor had higher levels of evidence. In total, 382 women with PABC underwent SLNB, and full data were reported for 237 cases. The overall live birth rate was 95.8%, while the overall neonatal complication rate was 3.4%. No cases of maternal side effects or anaphylactic reaction, maternal death, stillbirth, or neonatal death were reported (0%).
BackgroundPregnant patients diagnosed with breast cancer (PrBC) may receive substantially different treatments compared to general population, considering that certain treatment options cannot be applied during pregnancy due to their potential harmful effects to the foetus. Regarding the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in pregnant patients, potential concerns include foetal harm from radiation exposure, possible teratogenic effects of blue dyes and maternal anaphylaxis to isosulfan.ObjectiveThe main objective of the present systematic review is to summarize and present current knowledge and up-to-date evidence about the safety and efficacy of SLNB in PABC.MethodsMEDLINE, Google Scholar and UpToDate databases were searched up to 22 January 2023. Articles studying the safety and effectiveness of SLNB in patients for PrBC were eligible for inclusion in the present review.ResultsIn total, 63 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Forty-seven articles were strongly in favour of performing SLNB in PABC, 4 articles were partially in favour, 10 articles were strongly against and 2 articles were partially against performing SLNB in PABC. Sub-categorization based on type of study showed that the majority of studies in favour were of higher level of evidence than those against. Furthermore, there were overall 12 studies reporting on outcomes. There were overall 382 women with PrBC that underwent SLNB. Full data were reported for 237 cases. Overall live birth rate was 95.8%, while overall neonatal complication rate was 3.4%.No case of maternal side effects or anaphylactic reaction, maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death was reported (0%).ResultsIn total, 63 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Forty-seven articles were strongly in favour of performing SLNB in PABC, 4 articles were partially in favour, 10 articles were strongly against and 2 articles were partially against performing SLNB in PABC. Sub-categorization based on type of study showed that the majority of studies in favour were of higher level of evidence than those against. Furthermore, there were overall 12 studies reporting on outcomes. There were overall 382 women with PrBC that underwent SLNB. Full data were reported for 237 cases. Overall live birth rate was 95.8%, while overall neonatal complication rate was 3.4%.No case of maternal side effects or anaphylactic reaction, maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death was reported (0%).ConclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy seems to be safe and effective technique for breast cancer during pregnancy. This systematic review summarizes current knowledge and up-to-date evidence about the safety and efficacy of SLNB in PrBC. Sixty-three articles were included -> 47: strongly in favour, 4: partially in favour, 10: strongly against, and 2: partially against SLNB in PrBC. 382 women with PrBC underwent SLNB. Full data for 237 -> Live birth: 95.8%, Neonatal complication: 3.4%, Maternal side effects/death- anaphylactic reaction- stillbirth-neonatal death: 0%. SLNB seems to be a safe and effective technique for PrBC.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据