4.7 Article

Association between selective digestive decontamination and decreased rate of acquired candidemia in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a multicenter nationwide study

期刊

CRITICAL CARE
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04775-1

关键词

Candidemia; Selective digestive decontamination; ICU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) is associated with a lower rate of intensive care unit-acquired candidemia (ICAC) but does not improve survival.
Background Candidemia is a high-risk complication among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has been shown to be effective in preventing ICU-acquired bacterial secondary infection, its effects on ICU-acquired candidemia (ICAC) remain poorly explored. Therefore, we sought to assess the effects of SDD on ICAC.Method Using the REA-REZO network, we included adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h from January 2017 to January 2023. Non-parsimonious propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was performed to investigate the association between SDD and the rate of ICAC.Results A total of 94 437 patients receiving at least 48 h of mechanical ventilation were included throughout the study period. Of those, 3 001 were treated with SDD and 651 patients developed ICAC. The propensity score matching included 2 931 patients in the SDD group and in the standard care group. In the matched cohort analysis as well as in the overall population, the rate of ICAC was lower in patients receiving SDD (0.8% versus 0.3%; p = 0.012 and 0.7% versus 0.3%; p = 0.006, respectively). Patients with ICAC had higher mortality rate (48.4% versus 29.8%; p < 0.001). Finally, mortality rates as well as ICU length of stay in the matched populations did not differ according to SDD (31.0% versus 31.1%; p = 0.910 and 9 days [5-18] versus 9 days [5-17]; p = 0.513, respectively).Conclusion In this study with a low prevalence of ICAC, SDD was associated with a lower rate of ICAC that did not translate to higher survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据