4.4 Article

Micellization, interaction and thermodynamic study of butylated hydroxyanisole (synthetic antioxidant) and sodium dodecyl sulfate in aqueous-ethanol solution at 25, 30 and 35 °C

期刊

JOURNAL OF SAUDI CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 S109-S114

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jscs.2012.09.008

关键词

Critical micelle concentration; SDS; Butylated hydroxyanisole (synthetic-antioxidant); Interaction

资金

  1. DST, New Delhi [SR/FT/CS-59/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surfactants are found to enhance the diffusion significantly depending on hydrophobic/hydrophilic group lengths and the structure of the surfactant molecule. Aggregation properties of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the presence of butylated hydroxyanisole (synthetic antioxidant), at a range of temperatures (25, 30 and 35 degrees C) have been measured by the conductometric study in aqueous-ethanolic composite solution. The experimental data of aqueous-ethanolic solutions as a function of SDS concentration ranging from 1 to 14 mM dm(-3) show the presence of inflexion points indicating micellization and interaction mechanisms. Effect of temperature was also observed in increasing the CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration) in the narrow composition. From the CMC values as a function of temperature, various thermodynamic parameters have been evaluated viz: (a) the standard enthalpy change (Delta H degrees(m)), (b) standard entropy change (Delta S degrees(m)), and (c) standard Gibbs energy change (Delta G degrees(m)). The results showed that the presence of alcohol, as well as the composition of water + ethanol may have effect on thermodynamic parameters. The variation in these parameters with the concentration of surfactant or with the change in temperature suggests the manifestation of hydrophobic interactions in the studied system. (C) 2012 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据