4.2 Article

Hydrodynamical characteristics of a pair of elliptical squirmers in a channel flow of power-law fluids

期刊

RHEOLOGICA ACTA
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 61-78

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00397-023-01420-0

关键词

Pair of elliptical swimmers; Channel flow; Power-law fluid; Locomotion state; Motion type

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study simulated the locomotion state and motion type of elliptical squirmers in a channel flow of power-law fluids. The influence of different parameters on the squirmers was explored, and it was found that coupled structures are prone to break and viscosity significantly affects the flow velocity and motion type of squirmers.
The locomotion state and motion type of elliptical squirmers in a channel flow of power-law fluids are simulated numerically. Three locomotion states (independent, coupled, related) and three types of motions (upstream, intermediate, downstream) for pairs of squirmers are found and identified. The effect of height difference (0.5 similar to 10) between the initial positions of two squirmers, aspect ratio (0.3 similar to 1.0), particle Reynolds numbers (0.5 similar to 10), self-propelling strength of the squirmers (- 9 to 9), and power-law index (0.4 similar to 1.5) of the fluid on the locomotion state and motion type of a pair of squirmers are explored, and the corresponding hydrodynamical characteristics are analyzed in detail. Head-to-head coupled structures and body-to-body coupled structures are observed for a pair of pullers and a pair of pushers, respectively. It is found that coupled structures are easy to be broken for squirmers with larger aspect ratio or larger particle Reynolds number and self-propelling strength. The movement characteristics of squirmers are closely related to the initial positions of squirmers in strong shear-thinning fluid, but not to the initial positions in strong shear-thickening fluid. The dependence of viscosity on shear will also significantly affect the flow velocity, thus changing the motion type of squirmers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据