4.3 Article

The CODE∧SHIFT model: a data justice framework for collective impact and social transformation

期刊

HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqad050

关键词

social justice; data justice; decolonizing; quantitative criticalism; communication theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents an alternative framework to resist hegemonic social sciences in data-driven communication theorizing through a culture-centered approach (CCA). It argues for data justice by transforming interpretive data framings, disrupting dominant knowledge production around data, and challenging capitalist and colonialist structures through data. The article proposes the CODE<^>SHIFT Model, based on community-engaged projects in the Global South, which highlights the importance of data justice in different stages of community-led transformation.
In this article, we present an alternative framework that resists hegemonic social sciences within data-driven communication theorizing through a culture-centered approach (CCA). Building on the CCA in co-creating voice infrastructures at the margins, we argue that data justice requires transforming interpretive data framings, disrupting the hegemonic registers of knowledge production constituted around data, and working with/through data to challenge the structures of capitalism and colonialism that circulate the practices of exploitation and extraction. We build upon community-engaged projects emergent from the CCA in/with/from the Global South to propose the CODE<^>SHIFT Model, grounded in principles of equity-mindedness, collective impact, purposiveness, and systemic change. It highlights what data justice looks like in various stages of community-led transformation: identifying pressing social problems; bridging cross-sector coalitions and partnerships; organizing for collective impact activities; and sustaining capacity building. We reframe data as pluriversal, embodied, sacred, sovereign, disruptive, solidarity, and impossibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据