4.4 Article

Age-related change in gait efficacy and predictors of its decline: A 3-year longitudinal study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14767

关键词

community-dwelling; longitudinal study; minimal clinically important difference; older adults; self-efficacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference for a modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) and identify predictors of mGES decline. The findings showed that a decline of 7.38 points in mGES over 3 years was clinically significant, and poor agility and walking endurance were predictors of gait efficacy decline.
AimThis study aimed to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for a modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) over 3 years and to clarify the predictors of mGES decline.MethodsIn total, 87 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled in this 3-year longitudinal study. The mGES, fall history and physical function (chair stand frequency, open-eyes one-leg stand, open-close stepping test, walking speed, walking endurance [shuttle stamina walk test] and physical activity) were assessed at baseline. After a 3-year follow-up period, the mGES and Global Rating of Change Scale were assessed. The MCID was calculated using anchor-based methods, with the Global Rating of Change Scale as an anchor. The participants were classified into the decline and keep groups based on whether the changes in the mGES were greater than the MCID. A logistic regression analysis was conducted using the mGES as the dependent variable and physical characteristics, fall history, and physical function as independent variables.ResultsThe MCID for the mGES over 3 years was -7.38 points. A logistic regression analysis identified low open-close stepping (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.782-0.985; P = 0.027) and the shuttle stamina walk test (odds ratio, 0.974; 95% confidence interval, 0.949-1.000; P = 0.049) as predictors of the mGES decline.ConclusionThese findings suggest that a change of 7.38 points in the mGES was clinically significant and that poor agility and walking endurance can predict future decline in the mGES. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; center dot center dot: center dot center dot-center dot center dot. Gait efficacy indicates the level of confidence in walking. We found that a decline of 7.38 points out of 100 in the Gait Efficacy Scale over a period of 3 years was clinically significant and that poor agility and walking endurance could predict gait efficacy decline. These findings may be useful for maintaining gait efficacy in older adults by preventing a decline in physical performance.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据