4.3 Article

Barriers to Implementing the ICU Liberation Bundle in a Single-center Pediatric and Cardiac ICUs

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/08850666231220558

关键词

intensive care units; pediatric; surveys and questionnaires; workload; barriers; quality improvement; early mobility; ABCDEF bundle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify barriers to implementing the Pediatric ICU Liberation Bundle, assess differences in barrier perception by ICU staff role, and describe changes in reported barriers over time. The survey results showed that increased workload, communication issues, and lack of RT-directed ventilator weaning were the main barriers to implementation. Nurses expressed more concerns about liability and personal injury, while physicians and APPs were more concerned about family discomfort with ICU liberation practices. Some barriers changed over time, with nurses reporting less concern for patient harm and RTs endorsing less discomfort with early mobilization. The study suggests that efforts should be made to address these barriers, such as educating staff on the safety of early mobility, considering respiratory therapist-directed ventilator weaning, and standardizing interdisciplinary discussion of the ICU Liberation Bundle.
Objectives: The intensive care unit (ICU) Liberation ABCDEF Bundle improves outcomes in critically ill adults. We aimed to identify common barriers to Pediatric ICU Liberation Bundle element implementation, to describe differences in barrier perception by ICU staff role, and to describe changes in reported barriers over time. Study Design: A 91-item survey was developed based on existing literature, iteratively revised, and tested by the PICU Liberation Committee at Seattle Children's Hospital, a tertiary free-standing academic children's hospital. Voluntary surveys were administered electronically to all ICU staff twice over 4-week periods in 2017 and 2020. Survey Respondents: 119 (2017) and 163 (2020) pediatric and cardiac ICU staff, including nurses (n = 142, 50%), respiratory therapists (RTs) (n = 46, 16%), attending and fellow physicians, hospitalists, and advanced practice providers (APPs) (n = 62, 22%), physical, occupational, and speech-language pathology therapists (n = 25, 9%), and pharmacists (n = 7, 2%). Measurements and Main Results: Respondents widely agreed that increased workload (78%-100% across roles), communication (53%-84%), and lack of RT-directed ventilator weaning (68%-88%) are barriers to implementation. Other barriers differed by role. In 2020, nurses reported liability (59%) and personal injury (68%) concerns, patient severity of illness (24%), and family discomfort with ICU liberation practices (41%) more frequently than physicians and APPs (16%, 6%, 8%, and 19%, respectively; P < .01 for all). Between 2017 and 2020, some barriers changed: RTs endorsed discomfort with early mobilization less frequently (50% vs 11%, P = .028) and nurses reported concern for patient harm less frequently (51% vs 24%, P = .004). Conclusions: Implementation efforts aimed at addressing known barriers, including educating staff on the safety of early mobility, considering respiratory therapist-directed ventilator weaning, and standardizing interdisciplinary discussion of Pediatric ICU Liberation Bundle elements, will be needed to overcome barriers and improve ICU Liberation Bundle implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据