4.5 Article

Disruptive change within financial technology: A methodological analysis of digital transformation challenges

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02683962231219512

关键词

financial technology; digital transformation; interpretive structural modelling; analytical hierarchy process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The digital transformation of the FinTech industry brings various challenges, including new regulatory frameworks, legacy systems, flexible business models, and corporate social responsibility practice. This study adopts a mixed methods approach to uncover the interdependencies and priorities of challenges, such as investment in new market products and infrastructure, stakeholder support, and the development of a digital mindset.
The digital transformation of the FinTech industry has revealed a plethora of significant challenges for industry decision makers and wider stakeholder groups as organisations contend with the onset of new regulatory frameworks, legacy systems, flexible business models and alignment with corporate social responsibility practice. The reshaping of organisations and drive to greater levels of decentralisation and employee centric practice, presents a cultural shift for the sector, with implications for the success and resulting benefits of change across the industry. This study aims to develop novel insight to the 'lived in' impact of digital transformation within the FinTech industry from a factor interdependency perspective. This research adopts a mixed methods approach incorporating Interpretive Structural Modelling, Analytical Hierarchy Process and interviews with expert participants, to offer a unique perspective on the challenges and unintended consequences of industry level technological change. The findings highlight the high levels of interdependency and priority for challenges related to the investment in products and infrastructure for new markets, criticality of stakeholder support and development of a digital mindset for the adoption of new technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据