4.1 Article

Neurophysiological assessment of sympathetic cardiovascular activity after loss of postganglionic neurons in the anesthetized rat

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.010

关键词

Sympathetic postganglionic neuron; Baroreceptor; Chemoreflex; Guanethidine

资金

  1. Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this study was to determine the degree of sympathetic postganglionic neuronal loss required to impair cardiovascular-related sympathetic activity. To produce neuronal loss separate groups of rats were treated daily with guanethidine for either 5 days or 11 days, followed by a recovery period. Sympathetic activity was measured by renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). Stereology of thoracic (T13) ganglia was performed to determine neuronal loss. Despite loss of more than two thirds of neurons in T13 ganglia in both treated groups no effect on resting blood pressure (BP) or heart rate (HR) was detected. Basal RSNA in rats treated for 5 days (0.61 +/- 0.10 mu V * s) and 11 days (0.37 +/- 0.08 mu V * s) was significantly less than vehicle-treated rats (0.99 +/- 0.13 mu V * s, p < 0.05). Increases in RSNA by baroreceptor unloading were significantly lower in 5-day (1.09 +/- 0.19 mu V * s) and 11-day treated rats (0.59 +/- 0.11 mu V * s) compared with vehicle-treated rats (1.82 +/- 0.19 mu V * s, p < 0.05). Increases in RSNA to chemoreceptor stimulation were significantly lower in 5-day treated rats (1.54 +/- 0.25 mu V * s) compared with vehicle-treated rats (2.69 +/- 0.23 mu V * s, p < 0.05). Increases in RSNA in 11-day treated rats were significantly lower (0.75 +/- 0.15 mu V * s, p < 0.05) compared with both vehicle-treated and 5-day treated rats. A positive correlation of neurons to sympathetic responsiveness but not basal activity was detected. These data suggest that diminished capacity for reflex sympathetic responsiveness rather than basal activity alone must be assessed for complete detection of neurophysiological cardiovascular impairment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据