4.2 Article

New species of Asymphylodorinae Szidat, 1943 (Digenea: Lissorchiidae), fish parasites from the East Asian Region: morphological and molecular data

期刊

SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772000.2023.2286947

关键词

Asymphylodora; Asymphylodorinae; Asymphylotrema; East Asian Region; fish parasites; Lissorchiidae; Parasymphylodora; 28S

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New morphological and molecular data on Lissorchiidae trematodes from fish in the Russian Far East were generated. Four new species were established based on molecular data and morphological characteristics. The study confirmed the previous classification results of Lissorchiidae and provided the first molecular data on Asymphylotrema macrocetabulum.
We generated new morphological and molecular data on some trematodes of the family Lissorchiidae from fish from the south of the Russian Far East. Four new species, including two species previously considered Parasymphylodora japonica and P. markewitschi in the Far East, were established on the basis of molecular data and morphological characteristics of adult worms and metacercariae. Molecular phylogenetic analysis based on partial 28S rDNA sequences showed that the family Asymphylodorinae was monophyletic, while the family Lissorchiinae was polyphyletic within the Lissorchiidae, confirming the results of previous studies on this family. All asymphylodorine trematodes from our phylogenetic analysis were sorted into several groups, which differ from each other at the intergeneric level by molecular data but could not be confidently delimited based on morphological characteristics. For this reason, we consider all trematodes from Asymphylodorinae within two existing genera, Parasymphylodora and Asymphylodora, both sensu lato. The first molecular data were generated for Asymphylotrema macrocetabulum, the type species of the genus.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:E2800CDB-D2EF-4DA3-8912-07BFBE47E1E0

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据