4.5 Article

Wood-species identification based on terahertz spectral data augmentation and pseudo-label guided deep clustering

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2023.2293177

关键词

Wood identification; terahertz time domain spectroscopy; conditional variational autoencoder; pseudo-label

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces unsupervised learning into the field of wood identification and proposes a new wood-identification model. The model utilizes a conditional variational autoencoder and a deep clustering model to extract more discriminative deep features, addressing the issues of fewer labeled samples and the difficulty of extracting discriminative features in traditional clustering algorithms.
In order to address the problem that existing methods combining spectral data and machine learning for wood species identification rely on labeled samples, this study introduces unsupervised learning into the field of wood identification. It proposes a novel wood-identification model called DCVAE (deep conditional variational autoencoder)-PLCAE (pseudo-label convolutional autoencoders). Terahertz time-domain spectra of wood samples at breast height of five broadleaf and five coniferous species were obtained (40 samples of each species of wood, 400 in total). A conditional variational autoencoder was applied to augment the terahertz spectroscopy dataset. Subsequently, a pseudo-label-guided deep clustering model was developed to extract more discriminative deep features. The model was compared with three traditional clustering algorithms and four deep clustering methods. Clustering experiments and visualization results show that the comprehensive clustering performance of DCVAE-PLCAE is better than the other comparative algorithms and that the extracted low-dimensional features has a more straightforward structure. The algorithm in this study can solve the problems of fewer labeled samples and the difficulty of extracting discriminative features by traditional clustering algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据