4.0 Article

CHRND variant in a paternally inherited esophageal atresia and tracheoesophgageal fistula: Report of a case

期刊

BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2286

关键词

esophageal atresia; familial; genetic variants; paternal; tracheoesophageal fistula

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic basis behind the isolated familial cases of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) is not well understood. In this case report, a male infant born with EA-TEF and his affected father were evaluated using whole genome sequencing to identify a genetic causative variation. Several variants were found, including one in the CHRND gene that was present in both the patient and his father.
BackgroundThe familial occurrence of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) is very rare and the genetic basis behind the isolated familial cases have not been identified. A male infant born with EA-TEF and his affected father were evaluated with whole genome sequence to define a genetic causative variation in paternally inherited EA-TEF.Case ReportA male infant was born to 29-years-old, gravida 1, para 1 women by normal vaginal delivery. The patient was diagnosed as Type-C EA-TEF. In his family history, his father was also operated for EA-TEF during neonatal period. He had no associated anomaly despite patent foramen ovale. Genomic DNAs were extracted from peripheral blood of the patient and the father. When causative genes responsible for EA-TEF were filtered out, four different variants in NOTCH2, SAMD9, SUPT20H and CHRND were found. Except the variant found in CHRND (NM_000751.2, c.381C>G, p.(Tyr127Ter)), other three variants were not found to be segregated with the father who has EA-TEF also. This nonsense variant was not found in GnomAD database.ConclusionCHRND variant found in both EA-TEF patient and his affected father suggest that CHRND variant might possibly be considered as one of the causative genetic variants in familial isolated EA-TEF patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据