Progress testing of an objective structured clinical examination during undergraduate clinical clerkship: a mixed-methods pilot study

Background: Progress testing is an assessment method in which an examination reflecting competencies at graduation is regularly administered to students over multiple years, thereby facilitating self-directed learning. However, the significance of the objective structured clinical examination as a progress test in undergraduate education, needs to be determined. This study provides evidence of the role of the objective structured clinical examination for progress testing and optimal scoring methods for assessing students in different academic years.Methods: We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods pilot study. Participants were assessed using the Item Rating Scale, the year-adjusted Global Rating Scale, and the Training Level Rating Scale. The characteristics of each scale were compared quantitatively. In addition, the influence of the objective structured clinical examination as a progress test on learning attitudes was examined. Qualitative data from a post-examination questionnaire were analyzed, using content analysis to explore influences on self-directed learning.Results: Sixth and fifth year clinical students (n = 235) took the objective structured clinical examination progress test. The total Item Rating Scales were recorded (%) as 59.03 +/- 5.27 and 52.64 +/- 5.08 (p < 0.01); Training Level Rating Scale was 3.94 +/- 0.39 vs 3.22 +/- 0.42 (p < 0.01); and the year-adjusted Global Rating Scale was 4.25 +/- 0.44 vs 4.32 +/- 0.52 (no significant difference), for the sixth and fifth year students, respectively. The correlations across stations and the reliability of each station were satisfactory. Four categories were identified in the qualitative analysis: motivation to learn during the clinical clerkship was promoted, dissatisfied with being asked about things they had not experienced, confusion about being unable to use conventional test-taking strategies, and insufficient understanding of competencies at graduation. The scores indicated significant differences in performance according to training year.Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the objective structured clinical examination can be used as a progress testing tool for undergraduate clinical clerkships. Further enhancement of training opportunities and dissemination of performance competency goals in clerkship curricula are required if we intend to promote self-directed learning through progress testing.

Automated summary

This study provides evidence that the objective structured clinical examination can be used as a progress testing tool for undergraduate clinical clerkships. Further enhancement of training opportunities and dissemination of performance competency goals in clerkship curricula are required if we intend to promote self-directed learning through progress testing.