4.7 Article

The forgotten variable? Does the euthanasia method and sample storage condition influence an organisms transcriptome - a gene expression analysis on multiple tissues in pigs

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09794-4

关键词

Nitrogen Anoxia; Pigs; T-61 (R); RNAlater (TM); Liquid Nitrogen; Differential gene expression; Quantseq; Translational research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice of euthanasia method and tissue storage condition can affect gene expression profiles in transcriptomic studies. Nitrogen gas in foam (ANOXIA) is a suitable alternative for euthanizing piglets in transcriptome research. RNAlater (RL) storage preserves RNA better than snap freezing in liquid nitrogen (LN2), but it can also influence differential gene expression in multiple tissues.
Background Transcriptomic studies often require collection of fresh tissues post euthanasia. The chosen euthanasia method might have the potential to induce variations in gene expressions that are unlinked with the experimental design. The present study compared the suitability of 'nitrogen gas in foam' (ANOXIA) in comparison to a non-barbiturate anaesthetic, T-61 (R) (T61), for euthanizing piglets used in transcriptome research. Further, the effect of common tissue storage conditions, RNAlater (TM) (RL) and snap freezing in liquid nitrogen (LN2), on gene expression profiles were also analysed.Results On comparison of the 3'mRNA-Seq data generated from pituitary, hypothalamus, liver and lung tissues, no significant differential expression in the protein coding genes were detected between the euthanasia methods. This implies that the nitrogen anoxia method could be a suitable alternative for euthanasia of piglets used in transcriptomic research. However, small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) that constitute the eukaryotic spliceosomal machinery were found to be significantly higher (log2fold change >= 2.0, and adjusted p value <= 0.1) in pituitary samples collected using ANOXIA. Non-protein coding genes like snRNAs that play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing can subsequently modify gene expression. Storage in RL was found to be superior in preserving RNA compared to LN2 storage, as evidenced by the significantly higher RIN values in representative samples. However, storage in RL as opposed to LN2, also influenced differential gene expression in multiple tissues, perhaps as a result of its inability to inhibit biological activity during storage. Hence such external sources of variations should be carefully considered before arriving at research conclusions.Conclusions Source of biological variations like euthanasia method and storage condition can confound research findings. Even if we are unable to prevent the effect of these external factors, it will be useful to identify the impact of these variables on the parameter under observation and thereby prevent misinterpretation of our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据