4.6 Article

Boron subnaphthalocyanine additive for multilocus passivation of defects towards efficient and stable perovskite solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3tc03445c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel boron subnaphthalocyanine derivative was introduced into the perovskite film to passivate defects and modify the energetic positions, leading to outstanding performance and superior stability of perovskite solar cells.
Shallow and deep level defects often act as a pathway of ion migration and Shockley-Read-Hall recombination centers, respectively, in semiconductor materials, degrading the photoelectric performance and long-term stability of assembled photovoltaic devices. In this study, we introduce a novel semiconductive boron subnaphthalocyanine derivative (B-SubPc-F) with multi-functional groups into the surface and shallow layer of the perovskite film to further enhance the performance and stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). As a positive consequence, the detrimental defects of PbI anti-site defects and iodide vacancies are effectively passivated, while simultaneously modifying the energetic positions at the perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD interface to facilitate charge transport. As a result, the PSCs treated with B-SubPc-F exhibit an outstanding PCE of 23.35%, significantly surpassing that of the control device (21.75%). Additionally, the B-SubPc-F-treated PSCs exhibit superior moisture and thermal stability, with devices retaining 78% of their initial efficiency after being subjected to 348 h at 85 degrees C w/o encapsulation, in contrast to the control device, which retained only 16% of its PCE after thermal aging under the same conditions. A novel boron subnaphthalocyanine derivative was introduced into the perovskite film to synchronously passivate the dual defects and modify the energetic positions at the perovskite/HTL interface, resulting an outstanding PCE and superior stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据