4.6 Article

Cortical activation and BCI performance during brief tactile imagery: A comparative study with motor imagery

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114760

关键词

Motor imagery; Tactile imagery; Brain-computer interface; Event-related desynchronization; Artificial neural network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the cortical activity and digit classification performance induced by tactile imagery (TI) and motor imagery (MI) in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The results showed similar cortical activity patterns and no significant difference in classification accuracy between TI and MI. This suggests the potential of TI as an effective mental strategy in BCIs, particularly for individuals unable to rely on visual cues.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) rely heavily on motor imagery (MI) for operation, yet tactile imagery (TI) presents a novel approach that may be advantageous in situations where visual feedback is impractical. The current study aimed to compare the cortical activity and digit classification performance induced by TI and MI to assess the viability of TI for use in BCIs. Twelve right-handed participants engaged in trials of TI and MI, focusing on their left and right index digits. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the mu and beta bands was analyzed, and classification accuracy was determined through an artificial neural network (ANN). Comparable ERD patterns were observed in both TI and MI, with significant decreases in ERD during imagery tasks. The ANN demonstrated high classification accuracy, with TI achieving a mean +/- SD of 79.30 +/- 3.91 % and MI achieving 81.10 +/- 2.96 %, with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.11). The study found that TI induces substantial ERD comparable to MI and maintains high classification accuracy, supporting its potential as an effective mental strategy for BCIs. This suggests that TI could be a valuable alternative in BCI applications, particularly for individuals unable to rely on visual cues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据