4.7 Article

A model-agnostic, network theory-based framework for supporting XAI on classifiers

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122588

关键词

Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Model-agnostic XAI systems; Graph theory; Feature relevance; Feature dyscrasia; Sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a model-agnostic XAI framework based on network theory to explain the behavior of classifiers. The framework is different from other model-agnostic XAI approaches, as it is parameter-free and able to handle heterogeneous features. It introduces the concept of dyscrasia to detect the importance and interactions of features.
In recent years, the enormous development of Machine Learning, especially Deep Learning, has led to the widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in a large variety of contexts. Many of these systems provide excellent results but act as black-boxes. This can be accepted in various contexts, but there are others (e.g., medical ones) where a result returned by a system cannot be accepted without an explanation on how it was obtained. Explainable AI (XAI) is an area of AI well suited to explain the behavior of AI systems that act as black-boxes. In this paper, we propose a model-agnostic XAI framework to explain the behavior of classifiers. Our framework is based on network theory; thus, it is able to make use of the enormous amount of results that researchers in this area have discovered over time. Being network-based, our framework is completely different from the other model-agnostic XAI approaches. Furthermore, it is parameter-free and is able to handle heterogeneous features that may not even be independent of each other. Finally, it introduces the notion of dyscrasia that allows us to detect not only which features are important in a particular task but also how they interact with each other.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据