4.7 Article

Compact wirelessly-powered photocatalyst-coated spheres: Concept development and application for oxidative wastewater treatment and membrane fouling control

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104596

关键词

Ceramic membrane reactor (CMR); Membrane fouling; Photocatalytic spheres; Wirelessly-powered photocatalyst-coated; spheres (WPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wirelessly powered photocatalyst-coated spheres (WPS) have been developed and demonstrated for various applications, including photodegradation and fouling control. These WPS are cost-effective, easy to fabricate, and have excellent visible light sources, making them suitable as carriers for photocatalysts.
Wirelessly powered photocatalyst-coated spheres (WPS) were successfully developed and wirelessly powered from outside the reactor using resonant inductive coupling. Diverse applications of WPS were demonstrated for the visible light-assisted photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (textile dye), diclofenac, and triclosan (pharmaceutical compounds) and fouling control of ceramic membranes. These catalyst-coated WPS successfully generated O2 center dot- as the main reactive oxygen species (ROS). As demonstrated, these WPS are low-cost, easy to fabricate, have excellent visible light sources, and can be used as the photocatalyst carrier. The acrylic shell of WPS is transparent to light with wavelengths from 300 to 800 nm. Increasing the number of WPS can increase the light intensity proportionally, and 8 WPS can be powered by one power coil outside the reactor. A higher quantity of WPS per reaction volume can be used to improve the reactivity, bringing the use of WPS reactors closer to industrial applications. This is the first report on the use of WPS in the ceramic membrane reactor for fouling control, a 50 % delay compared to control, and highlights the versatility of this system. This work would open up new exploration avenues for membrane fouling control using WPS-based heterogeneous photocatalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据