4.8 Article

Correlation between structural characteristics of edge selectively-oxidized graphite and electrochemical performances under fast charging condition

期刊

CARBON
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118664

关键词

Edge selectively -oxidized graphite; Adsorptive -energy distribution; Fast charging; Cyclability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface-structural parameter of graphite has a significant influence on the battery performance during fast charging of lithium-ion batteries. Edge selectively-oxidized graphite samples exhibited improved capacity retention and rate performance compared to bare graphite, showing a strong correlation with the edge surface area and type of oxygen-based functional groups.
In the pursuit of ameliorating of the battery-performance degradation particularly during fast charging of lithium-ion batteries, we investigated the influence of surface-structural parameter of graphite. To explore the effect of the graphite surface state on the battery performance, we synthesized the edge selectively-oxidized graphite. The detailed analysis about the structural parameters of graphite samples revealed that the edge area increased from 3.41 to 4.26 m2 g-1 by oxidation process while preserving the specific surface area. Edge selectively-oxidized graphite samples showed the similar ratio between carbon and oxygen regardless of oxidized time, but the change of surface charge due to the different functional groups. The edge selectively-oxidized graphite exhibited a significantly improved capacity retention and rate performance compared with the bare graphite. Based on thorough examination about material properties and electrochemical responses, we corrob-orated a strong correlation among the electrochemical performance, edge surface area, and type of oxygen-based functional groups of graphite. Our study provides conclusive evidence that the surface nature of graphite plays a pivotal role in boosting the battery performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据