4.6 Article

Sol-hydrothermal synthesis of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 powders and corresponding ceramics prepared by traditional and flash sintering

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107621

关键词

Sol -hydrothermal method; Traditional sintering; Flash sintering; Ceramic; Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 powders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) nanopowders using a new wet chemical route called sol-hydrothermal method. The effects of hydrothermal reaction conditions on the powder properties were investigated. The results showed that uniformly sized NBT powders with pure phase and good dispersibility were obtained under the optimal reaction conditions. Additionally, a relatively dense NBT ceramic was achieved using electric field assisted flash sintering.
In this paper, a new wet chemical route named sol-hydrothermal method was used to synthesize Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) nanopowders. The effects of hydrothermal reaction conditions such as temperature, time and NaOH concentration on the properties of the powder were studied in detail. The results showed that as-synthesized NBT powders with were perovskite structure with rhombohedral symmetry and had submicron size (200 nm similar to 800 nm). The morphology of NBT powders was mainly spherical and they had good dispersibility. NBT powders with homogeneous size and pure phase were synthesized under the optimum condition of hydrothermal reaction at 200 degrees C for 24 h. It is worth noting that pure NBT ceramic could not be obtained by traditional sintering at 1100 degrees C for 2 h. However, the relatviely dense ceramic with a relative density of 95.8% and an apparent porosity of 1.8% was obtained by electric field assisted flash sintering for only 3 s at 700 degrees C. Therefore, the very short time flash sintering method was suitable for the preparation of volatile NBT ceramic. In particular, a mechanism named Electric Field Assisted Solid Crystal Growth (EFASCG) was proposed to explain sintering process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据