4.7 Article

Combined effects of inlet conditions and assembly accuracy on Nusselt and friction factors of plate heat exchangers

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108797

关键词

Gasketed plate heat exchanger; Nusselt; Friction factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of inlet conditions and plate's features on the thermal-flow performance of a gasket plate heat exchanger (GPHE) and assesses the impact of a modified tightening distance on its performance. No systematic study on the combined effects of inlet conditions and assembly accuracy on GPHE performance has been conducted before.
From 1920's on plate heat exchangers (PHE) became a successful industrial solution regarding energy conversion owing to their compactness and efficiency. Motivated by a well-organized assembly concept, the gasket plate heat exchanger (GPHE) grew into the most common PHE design. One century later PHE dimensioning is still a challenge: application of divergent Nusselt and friction factor correlations found in the literature yield significant differences on heat exchanger sizing and pumping power. In this work, the effects of inlet conditions and plate's features on the GPHE thermal-flow performance are investigated, since they affect the channel flow geometry. Furthermore, the effect of a modified tightening distance, which scales with typical measurement system bias, on the exchanger performance is likewise assessed. No systematic study was performed that considered the combined effects of inlet conditions and assembly accuracy on friction factors and Nusselt numbers for GPHEs. The present work aims at filling this gap. Experiments in GPHEs occurred with the inlet pressure difference between branches ranging from -1.5 to 1.5 bar, three plate thicknesses, two chevron angles, corrugation aspect ratios, plate materials and tightening distances, for Reynolds numbers ranging from 900 to 10,000.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据