4.7 Article

A dynamic installation method to improve the morphological characteristics of the bolt-hole contact interface in CFRP interference bolted structures

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107818

关键词

CFRP bolted structures; Interference-fit; Installation method; Finite element analysis; Interface damage; Stress distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a dynamic installation (DI) method based on electromagnetic force to reduce damage to composite laminates and improve joint performance. The study shows that DI can effectively decrease installation resistance, reduce severe damage to laminates, and improve stress distribution in the joint.
Dynamic installation (DI) of composite fasteners can reduce interface damage caused by interference and further improve joint performance. Understanding the low-damage mechanisms during DI based on electromagnetic force is critical. In this paper, a 3-D nonlinear progressive damage model based on continuum damage mechanics (CDM) was developed to predict the geometric dimensional variations of the bolt, the damage behavior and stress distribution of the bolt-hole contact interface after interference-fit connection. Static installation (SI) analysis was also considered as a comparative study. Experimental bolt-hole interface damage behavior validated the FEA results. The results show that DI can significantly reduce the installation resistance by thinning and elongating the bolt, so as to remarkably reduce or avoid severe damage to composite laminates, especially for large interference sizes. The low installation damage of the DI specimens results in more uniform residual stresses and higher amplitudes at the hole edges, which may be more conducive to achieving a more uniform stress distribution in the joints under external cyclic loading, thus helping to reduce the incidence of failure and extend the operating horizons of structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据