3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Constant Factor Prophet Inequality for Online Combinatorial Auctions

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3564246.3585151

关键词

prophet inequality; combinatorial auction; subadditive valuation; mechanism design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In online combinatorial auctions, a constant factor prophet inequality has been proven to exist for subadditive valuations using a novel sampling idea called the Mirror Lemma, resolving a central open problem in the field.
In online combinatorial auctions.. indivisible items are to be allocated to n agents who arrive online. Agents have random valuations for the different subsets of items and the goal is to allocate the items on the fly so as to maximize the total value of the assignment. A prophet inequality in this setting refers to the existence of an online algorithm guaranteed to obtain, in expectation, a certain fraction of the expected value obtained by an optimal solution in hindsight. The study of prophet inequalities for online combinatorial auctions has been an intensive area of research in recent years, and constant factor prophet inequalities are known when the agents' valuation functions are submodular or fractionally subadditive. Despite many efforts, for the more general case of subadditive valuations, the best known prophet inequality has an approximation guarantee of O(log log m). In this paper, we prove the existence of a constant factor prophet inequality for the subadditive case, resolving a central open problem in the area. Our prophet inequality is achieved by a novel, but elementary, sampling idea which we call the Mirror Lemma. This lemma is essentially concerned with understanding online algorithms for which the set of items that are allocated and those that are not, distribute equally. The other main ingredient is a nonstandard application of Kakutani's fixed point theorem. Finally, we note that our prophet inequality works against an almighty adversary and even can be implemented in an incentive compatible way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据