4.5 Article

A classifier-combined method for grading breast cancer based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory

期刊

QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 3288-3297

出版社

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-652

关键词

Evidence theory; computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); breast cancer; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI); machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the effectiveness of a machine learning classification method based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory for the histologic grading of breast cancer. The results showed that combining multiple classifiers using D-S evidence theory significantly improved the accuracy and area under the curve compared to using individual classifiers.
Background: Preoperative non-invasive histologic grading of breast cancer is essential. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a machine learning classification method based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory for the histologic grading of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 489 contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices with breast cancer lesions (including 171 grade., 140 grade., and 178 grade. lesions) were used for analysis. All the lesions were segmented by two radiologists in consensus. For each slice, the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters based on a modified Tofts model and the textural features of the segmented lesion on the image were extracted. Principal component analysis was then used to reduce feature dimensionality and obtain new features from the pharmacokinetic parameters and texture features. The basic confidence assignments of different classifiers were combined using D-S evidence theory based on the accuracy of three classifiers: support vector machine ( SVM), Random Forest, and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). The performance of the machine learning techniques was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve. Results: The three classifiers showed varying accuracy across different categories. The accuracy of using D-S evidence theory in combination with multiple classifiers reached 92.86%, which was higher than that of using SVM (82.76%), Random Forest (78.85%), or KNN (87.82%) individually. The average area under the curve of using the D-S evidence theory combined with multiple classifiers reached 0.896, which was larger than that of using SVM (0.829), Random Forest (0.727), or KNN (0.835) individually. Conclusions: Multiple classifiers can be effectively combined based on D-S evidence theory to improve the prediction of histologic grade in breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据